Bibtex
Endnote
RIS
The United States of America joined the war between Israel and Iran, by bombing three nuclear sites in Iran. President Donald Trump used his presidential authority to send stealth bombers, which dropped the bombs. They could not be stopped by Iran’s anti-aircraft defense. The President ordered the strike on a sovereign nation, without any provocation, and without the approval of Congress, that is their legislature. Whether he exceeded his authority or not will be debated for long and might perhaps go to court.
The three major conflicts in the world, Ukraine-Russia, Israel-Palestine and now in Iran, are severely testing India’s economic, geopolitical and diplomatic skills, strength and resilience
Even the right-wing supporters of Trump do not want America to be dragged into wars in distant lands. The bombs included the so-called bunker busters, weighing nearly 15 kilotons. It is unlikely that Iran’s nuclear program has been destroyed. Does the American bombing mean that the war is over, and peace has commenced in the region? Will there be an immediate regime change? Of course not. Iran is expected to retaliate. President Trump himself in a speech he gave in Saudi Arabia said, “ the so-called nation builders wrecked far more nations than they built …. and the interventionalists were intervening in complex societies that they did not even understand.”
The pursuit of strategic autonomy and building domestic economic strength need not justify geopolitical ambiguity bordering on timidity
Iran’s government has two choices. Either to capitulate and surrender, which will weaken the position of eighty-six-year-old Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, or to be defiant and counterattack, which can be suicidal. Both choices are bad because the Iranian leadership has to choose between humiliation and huge further damage. It is impossible to predict how this will play out.
The Americans have around 50,000 troops present in West Asia and more than a dozen military bases, across countries like UAE, Oman, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. The Iranian lawmakers have approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz which will blockade substantial oil and gas flow into the rest of the world from the region. This is something that Iran has never done and will hurt oil exporters including itself. It will affect a major supply to China, who is currently firmly on Iran’s side.
Pragmatism might topple a principled approach in the current situation, but it leaves a blemished track record, at odds with India’s historic position of being non-aligned, and providing moral leadership
Iran will risk losing diplomatic, moral and geopolitical support from all oil importing nations. The other retaliatory action is an attack on US military bases, by itself or by its proxies. The Houthis of Yemen have announced their intention and willingness to attack US bases.
The economic impact of war in the Middle East is a flare up in oil prices, and consequent inflation, investor nervousness and negative impact on world trade. It must be remembered that the USA is now the oil sheikh of the world, producing one fifth of all the crude oil output, a share which is the highest in six decades. It is also nearly self-sufficient in its energy needs and has become a net exporter. That is the reason that oil prices did not spike up to 100 or 150 dollars when Israel attacked Iran on June 9. Even after America’s bombing and the imminent closure of Hormuz, oil prices are under 100 dollars.
The Iranian leadership has to choose between humiliation and huge further damage
How does all this impact India. In geopolitical terms, India has to do a tightrope balancing act between two nations with which it has good relations. Israel has become a critical supplier of defense and surveillance equipment and technology. The port of Haifa has an Indian investor and represents a collaboration in infrastructure. India Israel trade has also increased rapidly and is close to 5 billion dollars.
On the other hand, Iran is an oil supplier to India. It was one of the few countries which agreed to export to India in India’s own currency. The Chabahar port being jointly developed is an important part of India’s proposed India Middle East Europe Economic (IMEC) corridor. Thirty eight percent of India’s crude oil, and fifty two percent of liquified gas comes through the Strait of Hormuz. The disruption in supply of LNG can affect delivery of cooking gas to households as well as India’s fertiliser production.
The USA is now the oil sheikh of the world, producing one fifth of all the crude oil output, a share which is the highest in six decades. It is also nearly self-sufficient in its energy needs and has become a net exporter
Also, India cannot quickly switch to buying more Russian crude, without earning the ire of the Americans. Higher oil prices affect inflation, foreign exchange stock and the fiscal deficit negatively. It also puts downward pressure on the rupee-dollar rate, which looks likely to slip below 87. It is estimated that a 10-dollar sustained increase in oil prices can reduce GDP growth by around 0.3 percent and increase inflation by 0.4 percent. Stock market sentiment can also take a hit due to investor nervousness.
There is also a moral issue, although geopolitics is increasingly indifferent to any moral aspect. How can an unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation not be condemned? India distanced itself from the joint statement of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) which had condemned Israel for attacking Iran. Even in the United Nations, if there is a resolution to condemn attacks by both Israel and the United States, it is likely that India will abstain. Even more remarkable was the Indian abstention from voting on the recent United Nations General Assembly’s resolution seeking an immediate, unconditional and lasting ceasefire in Gaza. A total of 149 countries including U.S. allies like Australia, Japan and the UK voted in favour, while twelve countries including the USA and Israel voted against.
How can an unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation not be condemned?
What is then the meaning of India expressing concern at the humanitarian crisis and murderous assault on the people in Gaza, when it chooses to abstain from a crucial vote. It is called pragmatic geopolitics, because of closer relationships with America and Israel. But then it also undermines India’s quest for leadership of the so-called global South. Pragmatism might topple a principled approach in the current situation, but it leaves a blemished track record, at odds with India’s historic position of being non-aligned, and providing moral leadership.
No doubt it is a tightrope walk and a balancing act, but it is also a chance to crystalise and define the foundational values guiding India’s global engagement. The pursuit of strategic autonomy and building domestic economic strength need not justify geopolitical ambiguity bordering on timidity. The three major conflicts in the world, Ukraine-Russia, Israel-Palestine and now in Iran, are severely testing India’s economic, geopolitical and diplomatic skills, strength and resilience.